The Real Significance of Wikileaks as seen by Stefan Molyneux

I’ve been a supporter of Wikileaks for some time (just see Why most Wikileaks Write-up is hypocritical, Wikileaks OR Have the Illuminati/Freemason underestimated the Internet? and The Illuminati Plan to abuse Wikileaks is rolling…), both financially and mentally. The following text is taken from the video below of the famous web philosopher and host of freedomainradio.com, Stefan Molyneux. He puts down the point about the real significance of Wikileaks so well, I had to transcript it for you to enjoy too (I’m sorry for my bad english).

The Wikileaks thing is beautiful. It is a complete sunrise of light lending on the absolute stinking evil of the ruling classes. It is beautiful, because, you see, the morality that we live under, its like a big rock rolling down a mountain side towards a little village of average citizens. Its only one way, it only bounces down the hill, it only goes one way.

But with Wikileaks its going two ways. You know the government can go through all of your bank accounts, through all of your health records, can send  their ferocious little spider cookie robots into every knuckle and cranny of your existence. And here, whats happening is, they are getting a tiny taste of whats like to be on the receiving end of that. A tiny taste! And they are going completely insane. I mean, if you’ve got literally dozens of US and Canadian and I think even a couple of Australian nut job dirt bad ass clowns at the top of the media in these countries calling for a literal mafia hit on this guy.  A literal mafia hit on this guy,who has been very careful about what he’s revealed. Who has revealed his information only through “Der Spiegel”, “The New York Times” and other mainstream articles. They’ve all published it first. And it had far wider reach.

I mean, Assange is a complete genius when it comes to marketing, because he knows, if he just dumped a hundred thousand files somewhere down the internet, nobody would give a red sock because it would take forever to go through it. But he sat down, he worked with all of these mainstream media organizations to release all of this information through them, gave them exclusives. Now is the government calling for the assassination of the head of the New York Times? Of course not! Because they need the New York Times to keep the docile masses lulling around, not seeing the thunder-cloud of the pending Fiat currency disaster that is coming down. So they’re going after this guy. You’re seeing the glove coming off the fist, the sword coming out of the  scabbard, the velvet cover falling away from the gun, and you’re seeing those hysterical crazy sociopaths, calling for the slaughter, the hit, its like it seeing out of a mafia movie.

And so I think its pretty unsettling to people to see “oh my goodness”, if we do one tenth of one tenth of one percent to the ruling classes what they have done to us, they call for murder. I mean, it’s completely insane, it’s completely hysterical, and its usherly revealing. It’s finally becoming light enough in the room that even people without the infrared goggles of philosophy and libertarianism and anarchism are actually seeing what is going on in the corridors of power. So I take my hat of him for that. I mean, the man has balls of titanium,  he really is quite an outstanding character.

He has its own issues, he was raised in a cult and he spent most of his teenage years on the run from one of his mother’s slaughterous or murderous ex boy friends. So he’s got his own issues for sure, and I’m not saying that he is a clear-eyed moral hero, he has his flaws, he bangs around with the groupies, I would say, a little bit too much. Dips his wikch in a little bit of a post feminist asset – but – who among us is perfect and I certainly don’t want to cast the stone in that direction. I think it’s a beautiful and revealing thing.

And whats happening now of course is that the Bank of America is in this guy’s sight, right? And so whats happening is: The Bank of America’s data, he has got 5 Gigs of e-mail and stuff, and all considered to be unbreachable internal by the Bank of America. And whats happening is, if the Bank of America knew that their foreclosures were illegal, because nobody owns these houses any more. The deeds have been blown up and scattered all into the four winds. If the Bank of America foreclosed illegally, there is gonna be lawsuits that will simply take them down, there is no money left for bailout. So I mean he is doing an astounding job of exposing the corruptions in the U.S. economic system and legal system and – I can’t even call that a legal system, system of armed predation – He is a beautiful floor tragic hero, he’s just amazing.

Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio Interviewed on ‘Infrequently Asked Questions’.
Move to minute 10:53 for the Wikileaks part:

Wikileaks OR Have the Illuminati/Freemason underestimated the Internet?

The current Wikileaks showdown of the past days show an incredible rate in the powerful exposing their suppressing mind-set. Yesterday I planned to write this post about the Illuminati conspiracy having possibly underestimated the power of free speech on the internet – today, the U.S. Air Force internally shuts down access to the web sites of public newspapers like the “New York Times”, “Guardian” and SPIEGEL ONLINE (see report on “The Telegraph” for example), right in the tradition of dictatorships of the last one hundred years.

To conspiracy theorists this is for sure no surprise, as the Air Force is seen as one main accomplice in the masonic plot of ruling the world with extraterrestrial help. Significant portions of the Air Force seem to be involved into the UFO cover up/selling out the world to negative extraterrestrials since the beginning:

Why is Wikileaks so dangerous to them?

Now back to topic. The powerful people who are acting so headless in regards of the Wikileaks-“threat” obviously have a lot to lose when it comes to information disclosure (see the list of People OK with murdering Assange). Their standard argument of “National Security” is getting lamer every time they use it. “National Security” has become a standard camouflage for crimes against individuals (US citizens as well as abroad), nations and humanity. Worst of all could be the selling out of mankind to the agenda of the repressive gray/reptile ETs. Have a glance at The Dulce Book and you have an impression of what kind of crime I’m talking about.

Now what Julian Assange, God bless him, and his activists have created, is basically a better shelter for whistleblowers by the use of technical tools/methods. Fear is the main weapon of all negative entities, and now fear has partly been taken away from whistleblowers. Some of these people have a sudden moment of clarity where they actually reflect what they are doing and decide to change about it and go public.

In addition, Julian Assange and his companions do have an invaluable credibility among truth-seeking people, just because their record shows them to be trustworthy and quite subversive which puts them in a positive contrast to mainstream media. With established newspapers, you never know who gets the material and what is done with it. From now on, whistleblowers will rather choose the internet for their disclosures. Before judging on Julian Assange’s integrity and motives please see this video on liveleak.com.

That leads to the real “threat” that Wikileaks, and especially the idea behind it, poses on the powerful: The activation of the positive, truth-seeking and honest masses. The events have very fast come to a point of mass involvement and engagement of the people where the powerful cannot control and track down every hacker attacking their sites, bloggers talking the truth, consumers sanctioning big business. Even some newspapers seem to have lost their fear of these powers and write the truth. As Bob Marley put it: You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time. Update: Newspapers appeal for Wikileaks protection

Why have the illuminati/freemason let all of this happen?

The freemason ring most probably did not take the internet for too big a threat for one reason: Information published on the internet does not seem very trustworthy. And if somebody was about to become a threat, they could race their special operations groups on that person to track down, intimidate or eliminate. On this testimony by Jon Robinson you find an example of such intimidation in paragraph 9.

When the internet began to be popular they tried to get more control by creating their own “Internets” – AOL tried this as well as others, but they completely failed (just search for the AOL-illuminati connection on the web). I suspect the illuminati to have a lack of understanding of the power of human achievements like the internet, freedom of speech, human rights. They are also limited, if human or not.

When strong cryptography started to spread they also tried to control it, mostly by their influence on american web browser producers like Microsoft. I can remember the days when a special version of Internet Explorer was shipped outside of America that did not include 128-bit encryption. The open-source movement has conquered this approach and ordinary people like Julian Assange can now fool secret agencies and the military complex with unbreakable encryption. See Assange’s ‘poison pill’ file impossible to stop, expert says on CNN.

My conclusion is that they did not underestimate the internet in the first place but the spiritual orientation of the majority of this planet as well as our willingness to engage.

Update: I found this video about Jay Rockefeller talking on the internet being the “Number One National Hazard” and I have to rethink my conclusion. It really seems that they underestimated the power of free speech on the internet. They just did not reckon with Wikileaks!

Who will win?

Speaking in the terms of two of my good masterminds, Alex Collier and David Wilcock, WE will decide who wins. In the battlefield “Wikileaks vs. U.S.” the dark might still win, but the idea of unaltered truth pervading to the public is born and cannot be stopped. Wikileaks has given us thinking people of the world the hope that truth will someday be revealed.

John F. Kennedy, the President who told the Truth about illuminati: