Letter to the Ruling Class

I normally don’t like to just copy-paste other content, but this message from Jesse Ventura needs to be distributed worldwide:

Letter to the Ruling Class

You control our world. You’ve poisoned the air we breathe, contaminated the water we drink, and copyrighted the food we eat. We fight in your wars, die for your causes, and sacrifice our freedoms to protect you. You’ve liquidated our savings, destroyed our middle class, and used our tax dollars to bailout your unending greed. We are slaves to your corporations, zombies to your airwaves, servants to your decadence. You’ve stolen our elections, assassinated our leaders, and abolished our basic rights as human beings. You own our property, shipped away our jobs, and shredded our unions. You’ve profited off of disaster, destabilized our currencies, and raised our cost of living. You’ve monopolized our freedom, stripped away our education, and have almost extinguished our flame. We are hit… we are bleeding… but we ain’t got time to bleed. We will bring the giants to their knees and you will witness our revolution!


The Serfs.

From  Jesse Ventura’s new website “We aint got Time to bleed”: http://weaintgottimetobleed.com/

Here’s my favorite episode from Jesse Ventura’s series “Conspiracy Theory”:

Why most Wikileaks Write-up is hypocritical

Jay Rockefeller, Enemy of Free Speech

Every kind of publishing needs ethical side rails. Sure. You could not forget, as any newspaper article or TV interview these days about the danger of Wikileaks has one main argument of attack: Wikileaks would not check the published documents first, does not take responsibility for its information put out and thus brings people’s lives  at risk.

Why this argument is wrong

  1. Wikileaks has a clean record in this subject in the past years. No collateral damage of the leaks to innocent people are known until today. Be assured that the enemies of Wikileaks would pick any indication of such like hungry wolves.
  2. Wikileaks DOES process documents first. At this very moment there are only 1’947 of the 250’000 diplomatic US cables published. Other example: Julian Assange’s insurance file: 1.4 gigabyte of unpublished documents. If they would be without responsibility they could publish all of this immediately.
  3. Wikileaks does not fabricate documents. Any state or company that creates potentially harmful information has its own duty to protect it. If it leaks, there is most often a reason, and most of the time it is not an act of revenge by the whistleblower but of personal relief.

Why this argument is hypocritical

Wikileaks has already brought to public some catastrophic crimes (just see the collateral murder video) by the governments and the military-industrial complex. We are dealing here with covered, officially conducted murder, torture, fraud, lying to the public and so on.  If you put these crimes in relation to any irresponsibility Wikileaks might have done or will ever do, the argument is not only disproportional but hypocritical. Information does not kill, people kill.

There are others who think that international relationships need secrecy. These people should really ask themselves why they need secrecy and what they have to hide. There is no reason why honesty and trueness should be limited to the private. If you cannot stand by your opinion and actions, don’t do them! You call this a naive position because the outer circumstances of human interactions needs deceitfulness? Then mainstream brainwash has done its effect. We are humans, we can achieve almost everything we can imagine.

Julian Assange is not a saint…

…but nevertheless a gift to humanity as a whole. There are voices who say that he does not live up to his own ideals, being egomanic and running Wikileaks in an absolutistic and completely intransparent way. After having followed many interviews with him my intuition tells me that he is very intelligent and real, but also very uncompromising on the subject and possibly quite self-opinionated. But Wikileaks as an organisation as well as an idea, is not quite equal to the person Julian Assange. Undoubtedly, Wikileaks could do better in regards of self-transparency, but that’s still no argument about if its work is valuable or not. With the resources and abilities Wikileaks and Julian Assange have had until now, they definitely did a great job. There does almost not pass one single day without disclosures of the non-transparent, ego-driven and manipulative ways of the powerful and rich. Julian Assange has already changed the world to be a better place. Stay tuned as the really big disclosures are surely up to come!

To go deeper into the ethics question, see also Decency and Disclosure: The Ethics of Wikileaks on the “Lippmann Would Roll Blog”

Julian Assange Interview – The Guardian – Wikileaks:

Ron Paul Defends WikiLeaks “Killing The Messenger For Bad News”:

Jay Rockefeller: Internet should have never existed:

Wikileaks OR Have the Illuminati/Freemason underestimated the Internet?

The current Wikileaks showdown of the past days show an incredible rate in the powerful exposing their suppressing mind-set. Yesterday I planned to write this post about the Illuminati conspiracy having possibly underestimated the power of free speech on the internet – today, the U.S. Air Force internally shuts down access to the web sites of public newspapers like the “New York Times”, “Guardian” and SPIEGEL ONLINE (see report on “The Telegraph” for example), right in the tradition of dictatorships of the last one hundred years.

To conspiracy theorists this is for sure no surprise, as the Air Force is seen as one main accomplice in the masonic plot of ruling the world with extraterrestrial help. Significant portions of the Air Force seem to be involved into the UFO cover up/selling out the world to negative extraterrestrials since the beginning:

Why is Wikileaks so dangerous to them?

Now back to topic. The powerful people who are acting so headless in regards of the Wikileaks-“threat” obviously have a lot to lose when it comes to information disclosure (see the list of People OK with murdering Assange). Their standard argument of “National Security” is getting lamer every time they use it. “National Security” has become a standard camouflage for crimes against individuals (US citizens as well as abroad), nations and humanity. Worst of all could be the selling out of mankind to the agenda of the repressive gray/reptile ETs. Have a glance at The Dulce Book and you have an impression of what kind of crime I’m talking about.

Now what Julian Assange, God bless him, and his activists have created, is basically a better shelter for whistleblowers by the use of technical tools/methods. Fear is the main weapon of all negative entities, and now fear has partly been taken away from whistleblowers. Some of these people have a sudden moment of clarity where they actually reflect what they are doing and decide to change about it and go public.

In addition, Julian Assange and his companions do have an invaluable credibility among truth-seeking people, just because their record shows them to be trustworthy and quite subversive which puts them in a positive contrast to mainstream media. With established newspapers, you never know who gets the material and what is done with it. From now on, whistleblowers will rather choose the internet for their disclosures. Before judging on Julian Assange’s integrity and motives please see this video on liveleak.com.

That leads to the real “threat” that Wikileaks, and especially the idea behind it, poses on the powerful: The activation of the positive, truth-seeking and honest masses. The events have very fast come to a point of mass involvement and engagement of the people where the powerful cannot control and track down every hacker attacking their sites, bloggers talking the truth, consumers sanctioning big business. Even some newspapers seem to have lost their fear of these powers and write the truth. As Bob Marley put it: You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time. Update: Newspapers appeal for Wikileaks protection

Why have the illuminati/freemason let all of this happen?

The freemason ring most probably did not take the internet for too big a threat for one reason: Information published on the internet does not seem very trustworthy. And if somebody was about to become a threat, they could race their special operations groups on that person to track down, intimidate or eliminate. On this testimony by Jon Robinson you find an example of such intimidation in paragraph 9.

When the internet began to be popular they tried to get more control by creating their own “Internets” – AOL tried this as well as others, but they completely failed (just search for the AOL-illuminati connection on the web). I suspect the illuminati to have a lack of understanding of the power of human achievements like the internet, freedom of speech, human rights. They are also limited, if human or not.

When strong cryptography started to spread they also tried to control it, mostly by their influence on american web browser producers like Microsoft. I can remember the days when a special version of Internet Explorer was shipped outside of America that did not include 128-bit encryption. The open-source movement has conquered this approach and ordinary people like Julian Assange can now fool secret agencies and the military complex with unbreakable encryption. See Assange’s ‘poison pill’ file impossible to stop, expert says on CNN.

My conclusion is that they did not underestimate the internet in the first place but the spiritual orientation of the majority of this planet as well as our willingness to engage.

Update: I found this video about Jay Rockefeller talking on the internet being the “Number One National Hazard” and I have to rethink my conclusion. It really seems that they underestimated the power of free speech on the internet. They just did not reckon with Wikileaks!

Who will win?

Speaking in the terms of two of my good masterminds, Alex Collier and David Wilcock, WE will decide who wins. In the battlefield “Wikileaks vs. U.S.” the dark might still win, but the idea of unaltered truth pervading to the public is born and cannot be stopped. Wikileaks has given us thinking people of the world the hope that truth will someday be revealed.

John F. Kennedy, the President who told the Truth about illuminati: