Why most Wikileaks Write-up is hypocritical

Jay Rockefeller, Enemy of Free Speech

Every kind of publishing needs ethical side rails. Sure. You could not forget, as any newspaper article or TV interview these days about the danger of Wikileaks has one main argument of attack: Wikileaks would not check the published documents first, does not take responsibility for its information put out and thus brings people’s lives  at risk.

Why this argument is wrong

  1. Wikileaks has a clean record in this subject in the past years. No collateral damage of the leaks to innocent people are known until today. Be assured that the enemies of Wikileaks would pick any indication of such like hungry wolves.
  2. Wikileaks DOES process documents first. At this very moment there are only 1’947 of the 250’000 diplomatic US cables published. Other example: Julian Assange’s insurance file: 1.4 gigabyte of unpublished documents. If they would be without responsibility they could publish all of this immediately.
  3. Wikileaks does not fabricate documents. Any state or company that creates potentially harmful information has its own duty to protect it. If it leaks, there is most often a reason, and most of the time it is not an act of revenge by the whistleblower but of personal relief.

Why this argument is hypocritical

Wikileaks has already brought to public some catastrophic crimes (just see the collateral murder video) by the governments and the military-industrial complex. We are dealing here with covered, officially conducted murder, torture, fraud, lying to the public and so on.  If you put these crimes in relation to any irresponsibility Wikileaks might have done or will ever do, the argument is not only disproportional but hypocritical. Information does not kill, people kill.

There are others who think that international relationships need secrecy. These people should really ask themselves why they need secrecy and what they have to hide. There is no reason why honesty and trueness should be limited to the private. If you cannot stand by your opinion and actions, don’t do them! You call this a naive position because the outer circumstances of human interactions needs deceitfulness? Then mainstream brainwash has done its effect. We are humans, we can achieve almost everything we can imagine.

Julian Assange is not a saint…

…but nevertheless a gift to humanity as a whole. There are voices who say that he does not live up to his own ideals, being egomanic and running Wikileaks in an absolutistic and completely intransparent way. After having followed many interviews with him my intuition tells me that he is very intelligent and real, but also very uncompromising on the subject and possibly quite self-opinionated. But Wikileaks as an organisation as well as an idea, is not quite equal to the person Julian Assange. Undoubtedly, Wikileaks could do better in regards of self-transparency, but that’s still no argument about if its work is valuable or not. With the resources and abilities Wikileaks and Julian Assange have had until now, they definitely did a great job. There does almost not pass one single day without disclosures of the non-transparent, ego-driven and manipulative ways of the powerful and rich. Julian Assange has already changed the world to be a better place. Stay tuned as the really big disclosures are surely up to come!

To go deeper into the ethics question, see also Decency and Disclosure: The Ethics of Wikileaks on the “Lippmann Would Roll Blog”

Julian Assange Interview – The Guardian – Wikileaks:

Ron Paul Defends WikiLeaks “Killing The Messenger For Bad News”:

Jay Rockefeller: Internet should have never existed:

Free Energy: Supressed by the Oil Connection for Decades?

Free Energy for All of Us? Picture from http://effectpulse2.volblog.at/?itemid=9887

What is free energy?

At the moment free energy is not much more for the public than a promise from mostly hobby inventors and a few companies: They say that energy can be gained from “nothing” or at least not from some sort of fuel. The term “free energy” is not clearly defined and the processes behind it are not proven by science. Nevertheless there are some quite promising concepts, explanations and machines and even physical possibility as I try to explain in this post. 

Einstein and zero point energy

Quantum physics assures and it has been proven that a complete vacuum – space with absolutely no matter in it – always has an energy amount that is greater than zero, first published by Albert Einstein and Otto Stern (Wikipedia on zero point energy). Experiments show that this energy amount is finite, the formulas themselves calculate an infinite energy amount! It’s like, if nothing is there, there is still energy, and possibly a very large amount of energy! This, by the way, is in complete congruence with Nassmin Haramein’s still unaccepted Unified Field Theory. His famous presentation “Crossing the event horizon” is found in the best quality at endederwelt.com (just scroll down a little).

Now what seems to happen in a complete vacuum, is that elementary particles (quantum) are constantly popping out of nothing and eventually disappearing into nothing. I do NOT think that it’s actually popping out of nothing but I’ll go into that in more detail later.
These particles mostly have an elementary electromagnetic charge, thus creating small electromagnetic fields. As the positions, directions and spin of these “ghost” particles are absolutely random, they normally neutralize each other, so from the outside it seems that not much is going on in the vacuum.

Making zero point energy useful

Having overflown some of  free energy device designs available on the internet, I suspect that a substantial number of them work the following way:

First these machines create an electromagnetic field over an exactly defined area. This of course, needs an initial energy put into the system. This electromagnetic field is used to “line up” the zero point energy particles, simply spoken. It seems that the field gets stronger by doing this. By switching the direction and position of the initial electromagnetic field in well-defined angels and geometries, actual current can be won out of such a system. Many inventors affirm that this energy is bigger than the initial energy put into the system. We are talking of a multiplication of 1.x to 12 times!

Whatever the detailed mechanics are: Einsteins formula E=mc2 says among other things that the energy contained in matter is huge. Are we sure that all of this huge frozen energy lying in front of our eyes will always be out of our reach, that there is no hidden passage ever to be found?

What mainstream physics says

Fundamental laws in physics clearly say that perpetual motion (machines always running by themselves) and over unity (getting more energy out of a system than putting in) is not possible. The law of conservation of energy says that you can only get the energy out of an isolated system that you put in or was already in before. Any researcher contradicting to such “laws” immediately looses much or all of his/her reputation in the scientific community.

I see two base problems in such an absolutist standpoint of science:

  1. What we call physical laws is nothing more than a description and abstraction of current understanding of science about a specific part of our reality. Most of the laws ever postulated by physics have been overthrown, enhanced or refined over time. As long as science has not understood and explained every last part of our existence, physical laws are nothing more than more or less accurate assumptions.
  2. The law of conservation of energy applies to isolated systems. Inside our universe I strongly believe that no such system has ever been observed or created. Everything in this existence is interrelated. This is not only a Buddhist wisdom but also a fact know from relativity and quantum theory. But is reality or the universe an isolated system? If not, and there is the strongest evidence for that, as I will try to show next, energy could come from places we do not have the slightest clue about.

Is the universe a closed system?

No physicist today can prove that the amount of energy is a static value in this universe. Some of the problems are:

  • We do not know the boundaries, if there are any, of this universe
  • We don’t have a clue about 98% of the energy in our universe (black matter and black energy). We only have a tiny information about it, which is its gravitation. About its complete sum of energy and if its static, we know nothing
  • We don’t know what is going on in black holes: Is all of their contained energy still to be considered as part of our universe?
  • There are essential wholes in our knowledge (reason for inertia – higgs field?), understanding of gravity (gravitron?), and so on…

With so little knowledge, how dare science to have such a dogmatic standpoint regarding non-mainstream ideas? Are scientists even the new pharisee? 

In contrary, there is evidence from so far away sources as physics, religions and even ET contactees, that the universe is not a closed system:

  1. String theory predicts the existence of at least up to 11 dimensions of this existence. As I understand it, there are interrelations between all of these dimensions, so possibly there is also energy coming in or getting out to such “places”. One upcoming blog post will  be on the question if the dark matter is gravity we receive from other dimensions.
  2. People who report of their contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations (e.g. the Antromedans and Pleiadens) report of parallel universes overlying our universe and having different “densities” than our’s (we are said to live in third density, next is fourth, up to eleventh and lately even 12th). There is a lot of talk in these circles about entities moving between these densities.
  3. Most prophets, wise men and religions talk of other worlds beyond this world. One of the most detailed religious sources about other worlds and universes is also one of the oldest: The Indian Bhagavad Gita. This 5’000 year old book talks in detailed numbers about different inhabited worlds in this and other universes.
    Examples (see bhagavad-gita.org):

    1. “The Vedic scriptures states that humans have existed for 155 trillion years in the current cycle of creation and annihilation and before this cycle there were trillions of cycles. The duration of each cycle is 311 trillion years. Beyond this planet, there are trillions of other planets with living beings”.
    2. “The Vedic scriptures state that there is a spiritual and material creation. The material creation represents 25% of God’s creation. Consisting of millions of Universes, and within each Universe there are numerous planets. This Universe that the planet Earth is in is the smallest one. There are other Universes which are millions of times bigger than our Universe”.

The misunderstanding

I think we should start to consider that free energy is not about perpetual motion or “creating” energy. It’s just about searching in directions that are unknown to current science and trying to enhance the picture of our knowledge. This, by the way, should be a central objective of science…

Inventions and patents

An in depth presentation of many free energy devices can be found at the great site free-energy-info.co.uk/ made by Patrick J. Kelly. I suggest you download from there a copy of the full e-Book to your hard drive. At the present moment, with all the fights around Wikileaks, we do not know how long such information is freely available on a free internet.

Here are some examples:
Stanley Meyer: He discovered a method of splitting water into it’ gas form (hydrogen and oxygen), using very little energy. He found that a common combustion engine could run on a small amount of this “hydroxy” gas if it was mixed with air, water droplets and some of the exhaust gas coming from the engine. He holds several patents.

Thomas Henry Moray: He developed what he termed the “Moray Valve”—a device for extracting “radiant energy” from the “energy waves of the universe”, which he thought to be an inexhaustible environmental energy source. He held several demonstrations of this device (from Wikipedia).

Eugene Mallove: He was a notable proponent and supporter of research into cold fusion. He authored the book Fire from Ice, which details the 1989 report of table-top cold fusion from Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann at the University of Utah. The book claims the team did produce “greater-than-unity” output energy in an experiment, which supposedly was successfully replicated on several occasions (from Wikipedia).

M. DeGeus: He was the inventor of a thin wafer-like material/device that somehow specially aligned the atoms or electron currents ongoing in that material, so that the wafer produced a constant amperage at a small voltage ­ continuous real power, or in other words a strange kind of “self-powering battery.

This list can go on for a long time. Please visit free-energy-info.co.uk/ for a very extensive outlay of free energy technologies.

Two companies working on the field of zero point energy:

Cumulation of deadly coincidences



It seems that almost every publicly known researcher on the field has been threatened or killed:

Stanley Meyer: Following his sudden death, an autopsy showed that he died of a cerebral aneurysm. Meyer’s supporters continue to claim that he was assassinated.

Thomas Henry Moray: In the 1930s, Thomas Henry Moray reported that he and his family had been threatened and shot at on several occasions and his lab ransacked to stop his free energy research and public demonstrations. The 1975 book The Sun Betrayed claimed solar energy production was being suppressed by the US governmental bureau allocated to help its development.

Eugene Mallove: Mallove claims that the results of his cold fusion research were suppressed through an organized campaign of ridicule from mainstream physicists. He was fatally beaten May 14, 2004 in Norwich, Connecticut by an unknown assailant.

M. DeGeus: He might have been killed by an artificially provoked heart attack, just the day he was about to fly to europe to present his invention to investors. Please check the details of this death at rense.com

Conclusions, if free energy suppression was a fact

  1. There would need to be a very powerful conspiracy among the oil industry (Saudi as well as US), the car industry (US and Japan) , governments/secret programs and even mainstream science to execute the suppression. There are obviously people on this world that would be egomaniac enough for that.
  2. These people would have committed the worst crimes against humanity (wars for oil, health), nature (pollution), individuals (researchers) and ethics in general (fraud).

If I combine these two assumptions, I find the same bad guys as are suspected for 9/11 and UFO/regressive alien cover up (Bushs/Freemason + Saudi). Coincidence?
The reader is strongly advised to do his/her own research on the subject and make up his/her own opinion.

Here is a start:
A recent report by mainstream organisation FAS – Federation Of American Scientists reveals that invention secrecy orders are at their HIGHEST level in a decade. A further report from 1971 (obtained under Freedom Of Information) reveals that some photovoltaic inventions in excess of 70-80% EFFICIENCY were subject to REVIEW AND POSSIBLE restriction.

Update: Is China up to release free energy devices/technology?

Among conspiracy theorists there is currently talk of china dropping out of a secret agreement with the US about keeping back free energy technology. On China Industry News there is an article from march 2010 about china having the technology ready. David Wilcock talks of china’s plan to release the technologies as well as putting up an international truth tribunal to handle the forces that were conspiring and manipulating mankind since world war II in his series China’s October Surprise I, II and III.

Wikileaks OR Have the Illuminati/Freemason underestimated the Internet?

The current Wikileaks showdown of the past days show an incredible rate in the powerful exposing their suppressing mind-set. Yesterday I planned to write this post about the Illuminati conspiracy having possibly underestimated the power of free speech on the internet – today, the U.S. Air Force internally shuts down access to the web sites of public newspapers like the “New York Times”, “Guardian” and SPIEGEL ONLINE (see report on “The Telegraph” for example), right in the tradition of dictatorships of the last one hundred years.

To conspiracy theorists this is for sure no surprise, as the Air Force is seen as one main accomplice in the masonic plot of ruling the world with extraterrestrial help. Significant portions of the Air Force seem to be involved into the UFO cover up/selling out the world to negative extraterrestrials since the beginning:

Why is Wikileaks so dangerous to them?

Now back to topic. The powerful people who are acting so headless in regards of the Wikileaks-“threat” obviously have a lot to lose when it comes to information disclosure (see the list of People OK with murdering Assange). Their standard argument of “National Security” is getting lamer every time they use it. “National Security” has become a standard camouflage for crimes against individuals (US citizens as well as abroad), nations and humanity. Worst of all could be the selling out of mankind to the agenda of the repressive gray/reptile ETs. Have a glance at The Dulce Book and you have an impression of what kind of crime I’m talking about.

Now what Julian Assange, God bless him, and his activists have created, is basically a better shelter for whistleblowers by the use of technical tools/methods. Fear is the main weapon of all negative entities, and now fear has partly been taken away from whistleblowers. Some of these people have a sudden moment of clarity where they actually reflect what they are doing and decide to change about it and go public.

In addition, Julian Assange and his companions do have an invaluable credibility among truth-seeking people, just because their record shows them to be trustworthy and quite subversive which puts them in a positive contrast to mainstream media. With established newspapers, you never know who gets the material and what is done with it. From now on, whistleblowers will rather choose the internet for their disclosures. Before judging on Julian Assange’s integrity and motives please see this video on liveleak.com.

That leads to the real “threat” that Wikileaks, and especially the idea behind it, poses on the powerful: The activation of the positive, truth-seeking and honest masses. The events have very fast come to a point of mass involvement and engagement of the people where the powerful cannot control and track down every hacker attacking their sites, bloggers talking the truth, consumers sanctioning big business. Even some newspapers seem to have lost their fear of these powers and write the truth. As Bob Marley put it: You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time. Update: Newspapers appeal for Wikileaks protection

Why have the illuminati/freemason let all of this happen?

The freemason ring most probably did not take the internet for too big a threat for one reason: Information published on the internet does not seem very trustworthy. And if somebody was about to become a threat, they could race their special operations groups on that person to track down, intimidate or eliminate. On this testimony by Jon Robinson you find an example of such intimidation in paragraph 9.

When the internet began to be popular they tried to get more control by creating their own “Internets” – AOL tried this as well as others, but they completely failed (just search for the AOL-illuminati connection on the web). I suspect the illuminati to have a lack of understanding of the power of human achievements like the internet, freedom of speech, human rights. They are also limited, if human or not.

When strong cryptography started to spread they also tried to control it, mostly by their influence on american web browser producers like Microsoft. I can remember the days when a special version of Internet Explorer was shipped outside of America that did not include 128-bit encryption. The open-source movement has conquered this approach and ordinary people like Julian Assange can now fool secret agencies and the military complex with unbreakable encryption. See Assange’s ‘poison pill’ file impossible to stop, expert says on CNN.

My conclusion is that they did not underestimate the internet in the first place but the spiritual orientation of the majority of this planet as well as our willingness to engage.

Update: I found this video about Jay Rockefeller talking on the internet being the “Number One National Hazard” and I have to rethink my conclusion. It really seems that they underestimated the power of free speech on the internet. They just did not reckon with Wikileaks!

Who will win?

Speaking in the terms of two of my good masterminds, Alex Collier and David Wilcock, WE will decide who wins. In the battlefield “Wikileaks vs. U.S.” the dark might still win, but the idea of unaltered truth pervading to the public is born and cannot be stopped. Wikileaks has given us thinking people of the world the hope that truth will someday be revealed.

John F. Kennedy, the President who told the Truth about illuminati:

Who is Chaukeedaar?

Young Lord Krishna, Incarnation of God on Earth some 5’000 Years Ago.

Chaukeedaar is my nickname for the purpose of this blog and it is the hindi word for “guard”. Below you will find the reason why I chose this name. If there will be a good reason or need in the future for me to make my real name public, I will do so.

For all the following posts I think it might be useful to shortly tell my spiritual background in this current incarnation in the most open manner I can. Most of it tells of a rather average life, I guess.

Childhood

I was born in a small western town in december 1972. I was raised in a moderate catholic tradition and I remember that we worker kids were quite sceptic in the religious education classes.

With about 6 years I run into the hands of some fundamental evangelists who were proselytizing among the children in our quarters. The wild stories about angels, demons and the like first found a very absorbing mind in myself, but soon I had problems with the strange pressure of their sectarian methods and I quit after a couple of weeks.

When I hit puberty, my father suddenly begun to show a new, tyrant side in regard of his Catholicism. I was forced to go to church up to when I left home with 20 years of age. So in church, during mostly very boring catholic sermons, I spent many hours of questioning christianity and the bible.

Education

Long before my high school years it became clear that I was best in geometry. Later, physics and to some degree biology, became my core competence, which I used to build a materialistic view on everything and question any religious belief system. In retrospect this can easily be interpreted as backlash to the indoctrination by my more and more superstitious father.

My main influence of this time was a book called “The evolution of consciousness”, which was, for my age, a huge and very scientific reading. That time, I strongly tried to understand my existence as mere functions of my brain, but also kept the possibility of having a soul in focus. Up to the end of my twenties I was a strong agnostic, meaning that I tried to not believe anything but to search and keep any possibilities open.

I started to study history, which proved to me the pure cultural and man-made background of the bible in contrary to the perception of fundamentalists, that their holy book is God written. I also started my studies in information technology, which I both quit after 2 years and started to work as a software developer and analyst.

Turn around in my belief system

While reading Doctor Raymond A. Moody’s book “Life after Life”, which is a quite thorough investigation in near death experiences, I realised that this was the first time in my life that I found provable evidence that we definitely have a soul that outlasts our physical lives. I also read about his critics that argued from a materialistic, “brain is everything” standpoint and found that they could by far not explain what was going on in the reports of near death experiencers.

On my travels to New Zealand and Australia I read two books that I bought from a Krishna monk when I was a kid. I got these two books for 20 bucks (an amount I was asked to choose myself):

These two books, which I consider my most important readings in my life so far, were written respectively translated by A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, a holy man in my eyes. The ancient vedan wisdom is covering many questions of existence, the universe, the soul, the worlds beyond, so much deeper and broader than any other religious book I know of.  When I now meditate or send my gratefulness to the creator, I call him Krishna. That way I have a much more positive, friend-like image of him in my mind than to call him God, a word which is – sad enough – somehow contaminated by my catholic background.

On the more scientific side I occupy myself with universal theories and try to understand books like “Three Roads to Quantum Gravity” by Lee Smolin but also complete fresh approaches like Nassim Haramein’s Crossing the Event Horizon.

The realistic Alien Dream

On a sunday night during september 2010 I had a most realistic encounter in my dream of something invisible, but slightly distorted, standing right to me beside my bed during my sleep. It was only a matter of seconds until this something invaded into my mind very brutally and determined. I immediately and instinctively fought back by shouting out so loud the name of Krishna that it felt like all the universe must have heard it 😉
The violation of my free will and integrity stopped in a matter of a part of a second and I also awoke that very moment.

For fear I could hardly sleep the rest of the night. I was already working up my encounter and realized that in my dream I was dreaming of myself dreaming… Sounds complicated, but I can tell that the location where my bed and the “alien” was positioned in the dream was slightly turned from my bed in reality of about an angel of 30 degrees. I so rather think that this was no real encounter, but nevertheless started a new phase of investigation in my life.

The search for truth

That’s when I started to search the web for information about dreams and aliens/UFOs to find out with what I have been dealing with. Before I already was quite interested in the UFO phenomenon and read books by Erich von DänikenTony Dodd and the like. I watched almost every episode of The X Files and found they got more and more disturbing instead of clarifying. With the information that I have now I suspect that the creators of the X Files knew much more about what was and is going on than most people at that time did. Remember that the internet was still lifting off. Just research for Majestic 12/Majic 12/Majestic Trust/ M12/ MJ 12/MJ XII/Majority 12 and you have a first entering point to a vast area of evidence.

Negative ETs

The alien/dream connection guided me to the web site of Eve Lorgen. If you have the same mindset I had, that all aliens are supreme beings and positive in their spiritual orientation, I suggest to read all of her articles. It should be obvious that being encountered by ET’s without your approval, being abducted, tested, mind manipulated and the like – there are thousands of testimonies on the web – this is NOT right and would never be done to a living soul by any positive entity of this universe and beyond. I then dug deeper and followed the information traces of the abducting “gray” aliens, their masters, the reptilian/draconians and orions, the world conspiracy of the illuminati around Bush senior and Prince Philip,  and all down to the most negative spirit leading all of this, also called Lucifer.

Here are some of the more profound sources:

Positive ET’s

At the moment I quite frankly do not know what of all this information about malevolent visitors I can trust or can be verified with the search power of a normal human being as I am. By the sheer overwhelming amount of sites, opinions and videos on the subject of these ET’s (or EBE’s, Extraterrestrial Biological Entities, as called by the program) this can all become quite frightening, which is always a bad mood for any soul.

After my dream, with all that information flooding my brain during the following two weeks, I also started to manoeuver myself into a position of constant fear and starting paranoia. I tried to fight it with meditation, praying, thinking positive, but only got rid of my fear when I found information about the positive, benevolent and helping entities around us, the Andromedans being in the first row of them. That’s when I found Alex Collier’s articles, videos and his online book “Defending Sacred Ground“. I feel the greatest thankfulness and love for Alex, a most honest and true person as I sense him, victimizing a quite life for ongoing extraterrestrial contacts with the ET’s from Andromeda and porting all the information to us.

Update as of 17.07.2012: Please forgive the greenness of my first steps as a blogger in the alternative “truther” scene. David Wilcock (together with his lying “insider” Benjamin Fulford) has clearly been debunked as a New Age/cabal disinformation agent, probably just an actor hired by some three-letter agency to work for a hidden agenda. Same goes for Project Camelot, its founders being secret society members.

Last but not least I would like to point out another important and very interesting person: David Wilcock. He always brings most surprising, but convincing, topics to mind, he is a great enrichment of my life, thinking and feeling. A good starting point into his work is his famous videos The 2012 Enigma and DAVID WILCOCK at the Project Camelot Awake and Aware Conference, Los Angeles, Sept 2009 .

Activation of my resistance

The recent repression against Wikileaks by the powerful (life threats against Julian Assange  by US politicians, observation of the Wikileaks organization by the US, big business like Mastercard, Visa, PayPal, Swiss Post playing mad) showed me that a substantial part of the information about conspiracies might well be true. The past years and weeks also showed to have an increasing rate of truth being disclosed and people choosing their side on the negative/egoistic and positive/altruistic, as foreseen by prophets like David Wilcock. I find there is also much evidence that the scale is tipped towards the good which makes me feel excited and happy at this moment.

For me, the evil has shown its face too clearly these days, consider my resistance as activated.

Chaukeedaar, the guard

I honestly never attempted to visit a hypnotist for finding out who I was in my prior incarnations. All the time I just felt that the creator (or his higher dimensional helpers) had a reason to block this materialistic world so consistently from the spiritual world and higher dimensions, which includes remembering prior lives. But that is just my perception.

On the other hand, thinking of what I could have been or wanted to be in the following worlds, being a guard or protector for the creator just absolutely feels perfect for me.

Ok, I know this is a way too large start for a blog post, I promise the following, real posts will be shorter 😉

My next post will be on “Wikileaks – or – Have the Illuminati underestimated the Internet?”

Welcome to Chaukeedaar’s Blog!

Dear visitor, wanderer, seeker, scholar, agnostic, atheist, deist – let me give you a warm welcome on my blog. Whatever kind of awareness and knowledge you find yourself at this present moment, I’m glad that you found this website. I hope you enjoy some of my thoughts.

This is my first blog entry ever so please forgive me any bloopers. Additionally, english ain’t my first language – this might explain “some” oddities you may encounter while reading ;o)

Chaukeedaar’s Blog is all about the base questions of life and existence – on a physical and spiritual level. I will approach these topics in a very open manner, which might needle some of the more scientific/rationalist persons. On the other hand, a logical approach to spiritual questions might disquiet more religious people who never try to get to the bottom of their believes.

On my next post I will give you some deeper information about me, my life, my sources, my guides and my motivations. With this, you will shortly know if it is worthwhile for you to continue reading…